Posts Tagged charges

Luton Out of All Proportion?

LutonBeing an agent, I have to organise travel on many different levels. Sometimes first class, sometimes business, sometimes leisure. In the space of a telephone call, I can go from “best there is” to “cheap as chips”, from long haul to short, from a simple there-and-back to a complicated itinerary of 15 or more flight sectors. Each booking needs the same amount of attention to detail, not to mention a certain mental agility with regard to tarvel planning, unique to travel agents.

Over the years, there have been many changes to air travel arrangements. The most relevant of which being the arrival of the low cost carrier. Althougth this arrival has brought cheap(er) air travel to the masses, for those that were used to the days of “get in early for a reasonable fare” – some changes have not been so wellcome.

In times past, if anything, you knew where you stood. To get a cheaper fare, you travelled over a weekend, you booked in advance. For a business person going to Europe, out on a Monday, back on a Tuesday, the best that he or she could hope for was a Eurobudget. We knew how much baggage we could take, we knew we would “get something on the ‘plane” and generally speaking, life went on. This all had to change. I don’t know the reason why, but it did.

Low cost airlines did not march over every airlines route map. They specialised in short haul stuff, holiday routes and in the case of RyanAir, opened up new routes that had never existed before. Despite this, the legacy airlines decided that they wanted a go at the low cost ethos – but for all the wrong reasons. Legacy airlines saw this simply as an opportunity to harvest more revenue and reduce such things as on-board service, without stopping to think about why people travelled with them in the first place – and one of the main reasons being that many passengers simply did not want the “low cost” ethos!

But that is not what I am on about, here. I want to talk about “proportionality”. What do I mean? This morning, I took my daughter to Luton Airport for the “… Where you truly whisked here from Paradise – Naaaah, Luton Airport” treatment. A trip to Palma. This trip had come about simply because a client had over 100 kilos of luggage and the easiest (and cheapest way, in this instance) was for the client to travel with 50 kilos and for her to go along with another 50, have a swim and a day in Palma and come home.

My first observation was that a luggage trolley cost £2. Now, certain low cost airlines will fly you to some places for 1 Euro. So, how can you pay 1 Euro for a flight and £2 (or 2 Euros) for a luggage trolley? Where is the “proportionality” in that? To put it another way, given the present £12 promotion of RyanAir, the cost of a trolley is 17% of the airfare. If you want to bypass the security queue another £3 and the minimum at the car park to see No1 daughter safely away £4.50. A total of 80% of the fare. There is more cost involved in using Luton Airport than in the cost of getting from Luton to Alicante. And do not forget that hidden in the cost of your ticket, under “taxes and charges” is the £8 UB tax – which is, basically, what you have already paid Luton Airport for, well, the privilege of using Luton Airport. This makes the cost of simply using Luton Airport more than some fares from Luton Airport.

I don’t know about you, but I like finality on pricing. I want to buy something or a service that does a job and in an ideal world, be able to then use that service without having to put my hand in my pocket every five minutes. There are things I know I will need – like a car park – but those should be at a fair cost, given that I have already paid, in my fare, an element for the use of the airport. Technically, I suppose, the airline has paid the airport for the use of that airport and that charge, presumably, should pay for their passengers to use that airport – UB tax is for Passenger Service Charge – and by all accounts, if the ramblings of airlines using Luton are correct, Luton manages to cook up some nice charges for their ‘planes to use the airport. £2 is a lot for a trolley. Why should I have to pay – why would I need to pay – £3 to bypass a queue? Should not the airport provide enough staff that daft length queues do not arise? Further, though Easyjet staff are, in my opinion, well trained and respectful – how does Luton manage to find, for their staff, the most irritable and bad tempered people around?

This is what I mean about proportionality, or to put it another way, that airports, specifically Luton, need to get their snouts out of the trough.

, , , ,

6 Comments

Metasearch Mania

Big debate going on about metasearch and travel. Or, to put it another way, who does the best “gocompare” for the travel business, or more specifically, flights. As a travel agent at the sharp end of travel, I am a little bemused by all the fuss.

Many of us in travel already know that if you want to book Easyjet, book Easyjet and if you simply want to go on Monday to Amsterdam and back on Tuesday, well, pretty much any old website will do. In addition, if I am going to Amsterdam at 0600 and back at 1700, then I do not need to metasearch anything – just getting a seat at any price would be nice.

Things are a tad different long and medium haul, of course – so does having a gocompare facility help here? Not really. Generally speaking, if you ask any website for a ticket from Here to There, any website will tell you. If you look at 24 websites or 124 websites you may find that the price goes up (a bit) or down (a bit) but it will not differ significantly – unless, of course, the website you are looking at has its fares loaded incorrectly (which happens more often than you may think)

The thing about it, is that in travel, you either have a net fare contract (ie cheap or consolidated fares) or you don’t. If you have it, then that fare is pretty much the same and it matters not if you book online, or offline at a travel agency. You get nett fare plus about £30 or £40 – which is the average going rate, these days. The other thing to remember is that for any destination, there are a (very) finite number of seats and an even more finite number of seats going cheap. If you want to go from A to B and there is a trade fair on and a football match and, and, and…… and there are only three aeroplanes going there on the day in question, you can metasearch your way from here to Kingdom come – it will cost.

The other thing an agent can do – and no website can do – is work the wrinkles. This applies especially to complicated itineraries (ie anything with 3 sectors and above in them; excluding simple A to B that have to go via somewhere) Fares can change dramatically by changing how the itinereray is ticketed, they can change dramatically by making a single flight a return flight or even by including a flight you do not actually want to take. A good agent can think about what you are trying to do and may, by instinct, know how best to do it. The internet metasearch fails because it has answered your question -the trouble is, you have not asked the right question!

What I do rely on the web for (and, notably, Expedia is very good for this), are routings. If one cannot find a raft of nice, consolidated fares for getting from A to B then very often I cheat. Expedia has a very good grasp of routings as well as being the most accurate site I know (along with Travelocity) for having fares correctly loaded. Actually, that is another reason why websites can be totally misleading. Any site (and so, indirectly, metasearch) relies on having the right building blocks to start with. If the fares and the fare rules are incorrectly loaded, then garbage in, garbage out applies. True, you can just book it and let the website carry the can – but if the fare is, in fact, invalid, you may be turned away by the airline at the airport or be asked for a lot more money. I am not going to tell you who is the worst as I do not wish to receive any cunningly worded invitations to visit a courtroom but trust me, there is one very big one out there that is rubbish on fares and hopeless on routings!

So maybe, just maybe, a visit to a good IATA travel agent could be the best course.

, , , ,

No Comments

The Great BA Rip-OFF

In case anyone missed it, British Airways have sneaked a little nasty under the wire. With effect from December, last year, if you buy a non-refundable ticket, then if you cancel, you will not get the YQ “tax”" back. Let us say you buy a ticket on BA from London to Sydney. This will cost you about £614.10. The fare is £332, which you would lose. Before, you would get the “tax and charges” back, which meant you would receive £282.10 back – less, of course any fees that your rip-off travel agent (me!) would charge. Now, BA say you will NOT get the YQ “tax” back – the charge for petrol and for “security” (9-11 is a long while ago, now, you would have thought they could get that in the fare by now) . On this ticket the YQ tax is £178.00 which you will now lose. Further, your travel insurance (assuming you cancel for a valid reason) will only refund the nonrefundable fare, so on the face of it, you cannot get a refund from your travel insurance either!
Why have BA done this? Because they can. because no-one will do anything about it. The media hop up and down when someone suggest £1 to go for a pee and yet they do not notice when BA neatly trouser an extra £178 (in this case) from some of the most needy air travellers – those that have to buy the cheap seats.

, , ,

3 Comments